Suchergebnisse

The author analyze the trend, determined by the evolution of contemporary technologies, towards the consolidation of a culture that privileges the novelty and immediacy above the heritage, and that therefore replaces institutions of historical memory, such as archives, libraries and museums, for private practices of mass and compulsive storage centered on trivial or not discerned information. Besides, this paper research the epistemological, ethical and political issues involved in this rise of a technological culture which is compromised with an inmediatist orientation. ; Se analiza la tendencia, determinada por la evolución de las tecnologías contemporáneas, hacia la consolidación de una cultura que privilegia la novedad y la inmediatez por encima del bagaje patrimonial, y que en consecuencia reemplaza las instituciones de conservación de la memoria histórica –archivos, bibliotecas, museos- por prácticas privadas de almacenamiento masivo y compulsivo de información trivial o de relevancia no discernida. Asimismo se indagan los desafíos epistemológicos, éticos y políticos implicados por este ascenso de una cultura tecnológica inmediatista.

Se revisan varios libros publicados recientemente que corresponderían al campo de la epistemología política. Sus autores pertenecen a tradiciones tan distintas como los Estudios sobre la Ciencia, Sociología del Conocimiento, Epistemología, Filosofía de la Ciencia o Economía. La convergencia en este tema es el dato más significativo, habida cuenta de las bien conocidas controversias contemporáneas sobre la ciencia. El núcleo central de los trabajos es la relación entre ciencia y democracia. We review a few volumes appeared in the last years about the topic of Political Epistemology. The authors came from different traditions such as Science Studies, Sociology of Science, Epistemology, Philosophy of Science or Economics. This convergence is the most meaningful fact, given the well-known current controversies in the general field of science. The hard core of the reviewed volumes is the relationship between science and democratic societies.

Abstract
Our aim is to examine why trust can be considered a second-order emotion and how the way in which trust plays out differently in aesthetic and ordinary contexts can provide another mode of investigating second-order emotions. Our thesis is developed in three sections and a conclusion.
In the first section, we perform an example analysis to show why narratives are important for our emotions. In the second section, we examine how trust can be considered a second-order emotion and establish criteria for identifying it as a second-order emotion. In the third section, we present one of the aims of trust, i.e. sharing knowledge between agents, when a testimony-giver shares knowledge in an epistemic trust process with others. We show how the relationship construction between persons thanks to trust, a second-order emotion that represents emotional ties between agents to achieve a first-order emotion.

"Group polarization-the tendency of groups to incline towards more extreme positions than initially held by their individual members-has been rigorously studied by social psychologists, though in a way that has overlooked important philosophical questions. This is the first book-length treatment of group polarization from a philosophical perspective. The phenomenon of group polarization raises several important metaphysical and epistemological questions. From a metaphysical point of view, can group polarization, understood as an epistemic feature of a group, be reduced to epistemic features of its individual members? Relatedly, from an epistemological point of view, is group polarization best understood as a kind of cognitive bias or rather in terms of intellectual vice? This book compares four models which combine potential answers to the metaphysical and epistemological questions. The models considered are: group polarization as 1) a collective bias; 2) a summation of individual epistemic vices; 3) a summation of individual biases; and 4) a collective epistemic vice. Ultimately, the authors defend a collective vice model of group polarization over the competing alternatives. The Philosophy of Group Polarization will be of interest to students and researchers working in epistemology, particularly those working on social epistemology, collective epistemology, social ontology, virtue epistemology and distributed cognition. It will also be of interest to those working on issues in political epistemology, applied epistemology, and on topics at the intersection of epistemology and ethics"--

"This book brings together philosophers to investigate the nature and normativity of group disagreement. Debates in the epistemology of disagreement mainly have been concerned with idealized cases of peer disagreement between individuals. However, most real-life disagreements are complex and often take place within and between groups. Ascribing views, beliefs, and judgments to groups is a common phenomenon that is well researched in the literature on the ontology and epistemology of groups. The essays in this volume seek to connect these literatures and to explore both intra- and inter- group disagreements. They apply their discussions to a range of political, religious, social, and scientific issues. The Epistemology of Group Disagreement is an important resource for students and scholars working on social and applied epistemology, disagreement, and topics at the intersection of epistemology, ethics, and politics"--